Be careful what you ask for
Politics
Those of us on the left have been somewhat schizophrenic regarding the election victories this month. On the one hand, there's a great deal of euphoria about the fact that Democrats control both houses of Congress (so long as Joe Lieberman caucuses with the Democrats, anyway). There's also a great deal of angst about what's going to happen next, what course this new Congress should take, and how the Republicans are going to attempt to throw a spanner into the works. Sometimes I think it would be nice to just have a supermajority so we wouldn't have to worry about the Republicans. At all. They'd be relegated to irrelevancy. With a 2/3 majority we could pass constitutional amendments and make any legislation we wanted to veto-proof. Right?
Not so fast.
While all of the above is true, you have to be careful about such things. See, I have never believed that the Democrats had a monopoly on all the good ideas out there, and in fact they come up with some that make me ask "What were they thinking?" Real Republicans -- not the ideologues who make up so much of the party today -- sometimes have good suggestions, and when they do,
I'm worried that if the Democrats were ever to get a veto-proof majority in Congress, we might see some spectacular legislation, but also some really bad ideas passed into law. What would they be? I don't know, and frankly I'm not sure I want to go there.
I guess my point is really that now that we have the upper hand in Congress, we should start undoing the damage of the last six years of
Then in 2008 we can take the credit for it.